Employee Trust and Workplace Performance †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Employee Trust and Workplace Performance. Answer: Introduction: Every organization has an individual system by which it operates in. For some organization there is the top-bottom system; others use the bottom-up system while other agencies use the flat system. Each kind of operating system has its structure. The structure of the organization is the medium through which information flows. Organizational structure is crucial to the functioning of any society. Different structure depicts different working conditions and different results. Employee participation and accountability is another factor that influences the operation of an organization. A sound management system cultivates close communication with staff, and this translates to achieving the goals and objectives (Owusu 1999). Meat pack is a food processing company that has recently changed its structure. All the changes made were aimed at improving the performance of the business. Several changes affected the management. Employee interaction with the directorate has been encouraged, and the ascending management systems have been replaced by a flatter management system to promote management accountability. Challenges have however accompanied these changes in the leadership and cultural context. This article will evaluate the changes made at meat pack and determine to what extent the changes have been effective. The report will involve some subtopics that will help in the evaluation. The approach Bison should take on the business: hands-off or hands-on Bison is the CEO of Meatpack company. The company has a target to become a 1 billion dollar company by the year 2020. The CEO Bison has the task of driving the company towards the realization of this dream. To this effect, Bison has taken several steps regarding employee performance. He started working with an executive coaching and senior leadership development company to help develop his senior strategy team. The development program was a wise move from him that will benefit the company. Leadership training helps the leader become an efficient communicator which plays a crucial role in employee motivation ( Pamlife 2012). Bison has also introduced the Human Synergistic Circumflex. The formula has helped him know the organizations culture about the behavior of the staff and management. Bison has also introduced a coaching consultation for senior strategy team members. In addition to this, he has encouraged the line managers to take on a more hands-on approach. Hands-on results into the managers taking on a leadership role and working from the front and collaborating with the employees to achieve the objectives of the company (Ray 2017).Bison has thus implemented a flatter structure and eliminate the hierarchical structure. The new structure has led to open communication between the managers and the employees. The hands-on approach by the managers and the flatter organizational structure has enabled the employees to be more accountable and the managers to lead from the front. Bison is now safe to take a hands-off approach to the business. The hands-off approach involves the management managing the organization through their team leaders and not interacting with the employees and never crossing the line of authority of the team leaders (Miller 2017). He has equipped his team leaders with the necessary knowledge through the development programs. The style of communication has changed from the previous shouting to a more derogative form where the managers and supervisors try and talk to their seniors and know what is not working as it should. The employees fear Bison because he is one of the founders of the company and thus may fear to question his decisions. The fact that there is some anxiety created by him should also encourage him to take a hands-off approach. The concern stems from the fact that the company has lost some senior employees and it had something to do with Bison. He also describes himself as not a big peoples person and recognizes that CEOs should be good at interacting with the workers. The above reasons and the contributions that Bison has made justifies that he should take a hands-off approach to the business and see the results of his investments pay off. The plan will give the employees the sense of responsibility, accountability, and fulfillment because they will be aware that they have been trusted to manage their tasks. This approach will also give Bison space to work on other big projects comfortably because he will be sure the employees will dedicate a lot of effort to their jobs (Miller 2017). He should give the senior leadership space and time to implement what they learned and to develop their qualities to be better leaders. The hands-off approach will induce accountability to the managers who will ensure their juniors work hard to reach the targets. The extent to which senior leadership change has been effective Senior leadership plays a significant role in any company. A company with strong senior leaders is bound to thrive in the world of business. Leaders should keep on developing to keep up with the changing times and be in a position to lead their teams efficiently. Great managers should possess qualities communication, should show maturity and learn to control their emotions because they are in the frontline of representing the companys values, flexible to adapt to both real and challenging situations, accountable to always aim at achieving the set objectives (Cincotta 2014). The CEO of MeatPack company has considerably invested in the senior leadership of the organization. He has introduced a leadership development session where the top leaders get more insight on how to develop their skills. A company-wide leadership development program was initiated in the company plus a coaching consultation for members of the senior strategy team. The results of such investment should have an impact on the enterprise. The top leaders should now change from the cultural expectations in a manner that will inspire their juniors to follow (Quinn 2016). They should change from the dominant set of values, behaviors, and norms to a set of rules that will encourage professionalism. Development programs should enhance self and secondary consideration structure (Tharenou 1990). The senior leaders, after the development training, should show more transparency and regularly update the employees of the companys vision and goals and give the direction to which the company is headed (Dukelowhow 2017). Effective senior leadership can change the culture of the company to be more inclusive. When decision-making includes all employees, they will make a greater contribution to team collaboration and will be more motivated to accomplish the organizations mission and objectives (Tsai 2011). Organization is another quality that strong senior leaders should have. Organization is a prerequisite of prioritizing. Senior leaders should present both self and institutional organization. The goal of this quality is to find things in the shortest time possible (Dinkle 2011). The institutional organization will aid the company in achieving its aims and objectives within the shortest time. Senior leaders should put an organized system in place which integrates the departments of the company to enhance efficient functioning of the institution. The employees should be free to interact with their seniors but at the same time respect them and ensure they get their work done. Compassion is a trait that strong senior leaders should have. Compassion increases employee loyalty (Seppala 2015). Managers should be compassionate but still firm enough to have their orders followed. Meatpack company senior leaders should have the qualities described above. Some members of the senior strategy team said that they gained a lot of insight from the training. Management organization in the company is not firm as it should be. There has been uncertainty about the composition of the senior strategy team where some members attend the meeting but are unsure if they belong to the team. Other members do not go to the meetings but are considered to be part of the team. Senior managers have adopted the culture of talking to their employees and talking about the problem. Managers will now understand the problems the workers face and come up with permanent solutions. The Rockefeller habits have were put into practice. Rockefeller habits involve the three pillars of priorities, data, and rhythm (Allison 2012). Managers can talk to their team members without offending them. Jobs are completed on time because the employees dont feel insulted by their seniors, but rather they feel like part of the company. A major setback for the company is the question of accountability. Meatpack Company has senior strategy team and a senior leadership team. Bison is also the CEO of the enterprise. When an occurrence that could be harmful to the company happens, the individual to take responsibility is not clear. The blame will have no one to fall on since the leadership positions are too many. Coordination and integration of the day and night shifts have not been cohesive. Priorities of the two shifts are not aligned. Increasing productivity is the priority of the day shift while the afternoon shift focuses on being ready for the sensitive lorry pick-ups. Senior leaders have the duty of bringing to balance the two shifts. Lack of coordination results in unnecessary pressure on one of the shifts. Employees coming from other companies have acknowledged that Meatpack is more organized than other businesses. An organization is key to the functioning of the enterprise, and the senior leaders seem to be on the right track. The number of managers who go through the schedule for the following day is too high. The managers should organize themselves to reduce that number or to take shifts. Overall the senior leadership of Meatpack is valid to a certain extent. Work on organization, coordination, and accountability still needs to be done. Industrious relations are good, and the managers take the leadership role. Employees feel appreciated and are more involved in decision-making. Yields have increased in the past year due to the collaboration among the seniors and their juniors. The impact of the change of the senior leadership is evident. What senior leadership can do to influence more change positively in the future Culture exists in every institution. Every organization has its unique set of culture norms (FAIRLEIGH DICKSON UNIVERSITY n.d.). The managers at Meatpack should set a more positive culture. Employee participation should increase. The rewarding of the employee is a good initiative towards developing a positive culture. The employees could be allowed to choose the rewards they would like. Choice of the present is expected to increase employee performance (Caza 2015). Recognition of employees helps in motivating them to work hard. A culture that involves recognition of workers will raise the performance of Meatpack Company. Employees will work hard with the aim of being the best, and consequently, it will result in better performance of the company. Trust is a valuable input in an organization. The level of trust workers put on their seniors determines how they will perform. The extent to which employees will trust their manager to be fair and honest influence the level to which the worker will engage in productive behavior ( Brown2015). Meatpacks senior leaders should get to know their juniors well. Biases should not be involved in decision-making or punishment. Employees trust in the management will create loyalty. Companies with loyal employees perform well because the laborers always engage fully in their tasks. Change often face resistance in the workplace. Often, the effort to bring change leads to diminishing job performance (Zenger 2015). Employee trust results to the workers accepting change since they know that their managers have their best interests in mind. Management enthusiasm also helps boost employee morale. Employees tend to reflect their superiors. The workers get to understand the mindset of their manager and can work towards achieving the companys objectives since they have a clear picture of what the manager expects of them. As staff becomes acquainted with the managements vision, they will be more willing to promote a culture of change and embrace the new ideas (is4profit 2011). A dull management impacts a flat attitude in the workers. Employees end up performing poorly or averagely and not to their potential. Meatpacks managers are young and energetic. Engaging the workers should be frequent with the intention of sharing their enthusiasm. Meatpack Company senior leadership has to show energy and determination with the aim of motivating the employees. Positive change is necessary for the company. Change requires a different culture. People at the workplace hold on to the institutions working culture, therefore, the management needs to strategize on how to implement change positively without rupturing employee relations. The extent to which Meatpacks flatter structure has helped create a cultural and performance change The culture of an organization grows over time. Cultural change is only accepted if significant events occur (Heathfield 2016). A change in the management style is significant to cause a cultural shift at Meatpack Company. Before the introduction of the flatter structure, communication to workers was through shouting. Managers would shout at the employees whenever there was a problem. Communication was top-bottom. Managers sat back and watched the employees work. Meatpack Company had the culture of employees not interacting with managers and the senior leadership not engaging the workers in decision-making or problem-solving discussions. Bison introduced a horizontal structure in the company. The structure has resulted into interactions among the managers and their juniors. Managers now engage the employees in discussions in finding solutions to common problems. Shouting no longer applies in communication. Senior leaders have taken leadership positions. Managers now lead in the everyday business activities. Employees now speak freely to the high-ranking officials of the company. The flatter structure has influenced positive change that the workers are embracing. The new structure has allowed promotion to supervisors. Employees with the talent and work ethics now have the opportunity to nature their talents and rise to senior positions. Performance of employees at Meatpack Company has changed due to the flatter structure. Workers engage with their superiors and give their perspective on company issue. Involvement of the employees has motivated them to work harder. Managers performance has also changed to better. The managers are now at the front steering the company forward. Engagement of employees and the senior leadership has resulted into working solutions for the problems encountered. The overall performance of the company has increased. Integration of company superiors and their workers takes credit for the improved performance. The increment in yields and lack of loss injury time in the past year marks the companys performance improvement. Change, especially in an organization is not readily embraced by everyone. Barriers to change always require a smart strategy to maneuver around them. Often employees are resistant to change because they feel that the modification is going to make their life worse. Failure of the management to examine the current state also causes resistance (Mar 2013). Some cultural shift occurs as the company grows while some changes are planned (Lee 2016). Change, however, cannot take place overnight. Workers cannot change their culture immediately. Various aspects of the business area and the complexity of the interrelated parts affect the workers Fortunately for Meatpack Company, there has not been any barriers to the culture change. Development programs that the senior leaders took inspired them to become better leaders. Managers willingly interacted with the employees. Reception by the employees of the culture change was positive. The CFO, CEO, COO all embraced the cultural shift. Culture change at the company is active because the existing norms were not favorable to the workers. Shouting at the employees was not the best way to communicate. Employees yearned for managerial understanding on the problems they encounter at the company. The new culture allowed discussions and consultations between workers and the managers. Inclusivity of the laborers in decision-making was a change for the better. Senior executives, through the development training, realized that engaging their juniors was a better style of leadership than shouting at them. The training programs for the senior leadership of the company were a smart move to in itiate the change. List References Allison, S 2012. Mastering The Rockefeller Habits-How to scale a Hyper-growth Business.[Online] Available at: www.forbes.com [Accessed 31 September 2017]. Caza, A. McCarter M.W. Gregory. B. Northcraft 2015. Performance Benefits of reward choice: a procedural perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 25(2), pp. 184-199. Cincotta, C 2014. 7 Traits to Turn Good Managers into Great Managers. [Online] Available at: www.entrepreneur.com/article/238129. [Accessed 29 September 2017]. Dinkle, A M 2011. Time Management: Organization and Prioritizing. [Online] Available at: www.alnmag.com/article/2011/04/time-management-organization-and-prioritizing [Accessed 29 September 2017]. Dukelowhow, J 2017. how senior leadership can improve employee communication. [Online] Available at: www.tembosocial.com/blog/how-senior-leadership-can-improve-employee-communication [Accessed 5September 2017]. FAIRLEIGH DICKSON UNIVERSITY, n.d. Enhance Your Business by Creating A POSITIVE culture. [Online] Available at: view2.fdu/academics/silberman-college/centers-and-institutes/rothan-institute-of-entrepreneurship/outreach-programs/family-business-forum/family-ink-articles/7-enhance-your -business/ [Accessed 29 September 2017]. Heathfield, S. M 2016. How To Change Your Company Culture. [Online] Available at: www.the balance.com/how-to-chnge-your-culture-1918810 [Accessed 29 September 2017]. Zenger, J. Folkman J 2015. 7 things Leaders Doto Help People Change. [Online] Available at: hbr.org/2015/07/7-things-leaders-do-to-help-people-change [Accessed 29 September 2017]. Miller, K 2017. Hands-on managersvs. Hands-off Mangers. [Online] Available at: www.workzone.com/blog/hands-on-mangers-vs-hands-off-managers/ [Accessed 28 September 20117]. Owusu, Y A 1999. Importance of employee involvement inworld-classagile management systems. InternationalJournalof agile, 1(2), pp. 107-115. Tharenou,P. lydon J.T 1990. The effect of a supervisory development program on leadership style. Journal of business and psychology, 4(3), pp. 365-373. Ray, l 2017. azcntral. [Online] Available at: yourbusiness.azcentral.com/handson-leadership-7838.html [Accessed 28 September 2017]. Pamlife, R, Pectu A.J., Draghic M. 2012. The Importance of Leadership in driving a strategic lean six sigma management. [Online] Available at: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s1877042812044540 [Accessed 28 September 2017]. Quinn, R. Quinin R.E. 2016. Change management and leadership have to mesh. [Online] Available at: hbr.org/2016/01/change-management-and-leadership-development-have-to-mesh [Accessed 29 September 2017]. Brown, S, Taylor K 2015. Employee trust and workplace performance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Volume 116, pp. 361-378. Seppala, E 2015. why compassion is a better managerial aspect than toughness. [Online] Available at: hbr.org/2015/05/why-compassion-is-a-better-managerial-tactic-than-toughness [Accessed 29 September 2017]. The is4profit team, 2011. How to bring positive change to your business. [Online] Available at: is4profit.com/how- to bring-positive-change-in-your-business/ [Accessed 29 September 2017]. Tsai, Y 2011. Relationship between Organizational Culture,LeadershipBehavior, and Job satisfaction. [Online] Available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article/PMC3123547/ [Accessed 29 September 2017].